Do you multitask during meetings? How to check on your Mac
· 6 min read
Most people do, and more than they think. On a Mac it is easy to check: if another app was in front while a call was running, you were doing something else for that stretch. Compare a week of meetings with a record of which app was in front, and you get a list of the meetings that hold your attention and the ones that do not. Treat it as information about your calendar, not a verdict on your character.
What multitasking in a meeting looks like on a Mac
While you are watching and talking, the call app is in front. The moment you click into mail, a chat window or a document, that app is in front instead, and the call carries on behind it. A record of the front app through the day therefore shows three patterns:
- Glances. A minute in chat, back to the call, thirty seconds in mail, back again. Short and frequent.
- Parallel work. Twenty minutes in a spreadsheet during a status meeting, with the call playing like a radio.
- Absence. The call starts, another app comes forward, and the call app does not return to the front until it is time to leave.
Not all of this is a problem. Taking notes is part of the meeting. So is looking up a figure someone asked for, or opening the document under discussion.
How to check a week of calls
You need two lists: when your meetings were, and which app was in front at those times.
- List the week’s meetings. Open Calendar and write down each call’s start and end time.
- Record the front app all week. Punchcard does this without a timer. It notices which app is in front through the day and prints a receipt at the closing time you set.
- Export the CSV at the end of the week. It has one row per session: start, end, app, idle and seconds.
- Open it in Numbers and sort by start time.
- For each meeting, read the rows between its start and its end. Every row for an app other than the call app is time spent elsewhere.
- Set aside the apps that were part of the meeting, such as your notes app or the document you were presenting.
- Write two things next to each meeting: the minutes spent elsewhere, and where they went.
The daily receipt gives a quicker, rougher view: the top five apps with a time on each, the rest as MISC, and a day total. On a day you remember as “all meetings”, look at what sits beside the call app. If mail and chat are large too, the CSV tells you which meetings that happened in.
Tracking is free and does not expire, and the CSV export works without a license, so the whole check costs nothing. The first two receipts are free; printing after that needs the license, $9 once.
What the record can and cannot show
It helps to know the edges of this method before you draw conclusions.
It sees one app at a time. Punchcard records the app in front. If mail is open on a second display and you read it without clicking, the call app is still in front and nothing is recorded. The same goes for your phone. The record shows the least you were doing elsewhere, never the most.
It does not measure listening. The call app being in front means its window was active, not that you were paying attention, so do not read its line as a score for attendance. The useful evidence is the other kind: rows for other apps inside the meeting’s hour.
Calls in a browser tab need one setting. If your meetings run in a browser, the call and every other tab share the browser’s line, and switching tabs during the call is invisible. With “Itemize websites” switched on in Settings, the meeting site and the other sites you visit print as separate lines, and the export includes the site for each session. The feature is optional and off by default, and it works in a specific set of browsers that does not include Safari; the guide to website time has the list.
It does not know your calendar. Punchcard has no integrations, so it cannot match sessions to meetings for you. That is the step you do by hand in Numbers.
It never sees content. No window titles, no document names, no screen contents. It can show that you were in mail during the budget review, not which message you were reading.
Read the result without beating yourself up
Go through the list one meeting at a time. Each pattern points to a different conclusion.
Almost nothing elsewhere. This meeting holds your attention. Whatever it is doing, it works. Keep it.
Glances at chat and mail. This is the cost of being reachable. If the meeting matters, quit chat and mail for its length, or turn on a Focus. If it does not matter much, the glances are probably fine.
Long parallel work, every week, in the same meeting. This is the most useful finding. A recurring meeting in which you reliably do other work does not need you, or does not need all of you. You are also getting less done in that half hour than you would with the call off, which The real cost of switching apps all day explains.
Absent from start to finish. You are attending in name only. The only question is whether to make that official.
What to change
For a meeting that does not need you, there are several steps short of declining it:
- Ask for the notes or the recording instead.
- Attend for your own item and leave when it is done.
- Join every other week.
- Suggest that the update be written down, with a shorter call only for questions.
The record makes the request easier. “I checked, and I spend most of this meeting in my editor. Could I read the notes instead?” is an observation about yourself, not a complaint about the meeting.
For a meeting that does need you, remove the temptation. Put the call in full screen, quit mail and chat, and take notes on paper if a notes app leads you back to the inbox.
Check again after two weeks. Meetings versus making measures the wider split between calls and your own work, and Do no-meeting days work? tests the opposite approach.
Questions
Is multitasking during meetings always bad?
No. In a large meeting where one item in ten concerns you, quiet work between your items can be sensible. It becomes a problem when the meeting needs your judgment, or when the parallel work suffers too.
Does taking notes count as multitasking?
Not for this purpose. A notes app in front during a call is participation. Leave it out when you add up the time spent elsewhere.
Who can see this record?
It stays on your Mac in a single file, with no account and no cloud, and the tracked data is never sent anywhere. Anyone with access to your Mac’s files could open it, so on a company machine read Can you run a personal time tracker on a work Mac? first.